| _bx_events_caption_title | tory burch outlet | ||
| _bx_events_caption_place | mllm | ||
| _bx_events_caption_event_start | 06.04.2011 13:17 (412 Days Ago) | ||
| _bx_events_caption_event_end | 06.04.2011 13:17 (412 Days Ago) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Empty
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
cross-examination, nor to determine whether it is or is not evidence of facts. True it is that there might have been better evidence of Le dre beats Patourel being duly licensed, as a certificate from the pilot authorities, or a certified copy of the licence: but acting upon the principles I have stated, I am of opinion that there is adequate admissible evidence to satisfy my mind that Le Patourel was a licensed pilot in charge of this ship.The Pilot Act Th6 next question is the proof of the 6th article, which pleads the Pilot Act of Calcutta. I burberry online sale have no doubt on this point. I think that the evidence of Mr. Parker, producing an authentic copy oakley sunglasses uk of the Act officially forwarded by the Bengal Government is quite sufficient. Indian marriages oakley sunglasses have been proved by an extract copy of the copy of the Indian register forwarded from India to the India House. At first the officer used to be in attendance with the copy register, but this was afterwards understood to be unnecessary, and discontinued.But noyhe Th6 next question is of essential importance. The 7th article or'a order. " pleads that on the 18th of July, 1856, it was ordered by the Lieutenant-Governor of burberry outlet Bengal in the Rules and Regulations with respect to the limits of the port of Calcutta in the words following :—" With the sanction of the Governor-General of India in Council, it is hereby declared that the port of Calcutta and tbe navigable river and channels leading to that port are subjectDiaitized beats by dre bv GoogleTHE PEERLESS.43to Act No. XXII., of 1855—and that in consequence oakley sunglasses thereof I860, the said Act hath ever since that time been, and now is, binding February 17. and in full force upon vessels navigating the said River Hooghly. The proof of this article depends entirely on the evidence of Mr. Parker. There is no copy of the Rules and Regulations pleaded or produced; and Mr. Parker only deposes, that from a letter of the Governor or Lieutenant-Governor, he knows the fact that the navigable rivers and channels leading to the port were made subject to the Act: he produces no such letter or extract from such letter. This is the turning point of the case. It matters not that the Pilot Act was passed, unless it be shown that it is applicable to the locus in quo; the provisions of the Act must be specially extended by order of the local government. Of this order I have no evidence, save that Mr. Parker, from some letter not produced, deposes that there was such an order. How burberry sale can I receive such evidence as this ? It is even less than viva, voce evidence of the contents of a oakley uk written instrument : it is the evidence of a person who never saw the order, and forms
- There are no comments yet






